Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 Mavericks saddle up for some old-time wrangling 

Mavericks saddle up for some old-time wrangling

BOB Katter is a larrikin famous for wearing a 10-gallon hat over his shock of white hair, an unabashed protectionist who walked out on the National Party in the lead-up to the 2001 election, declaring Howard government policies had destroyed the livelihoods of tobacco growers in his constituency.

Tony Windsor is a tough pragmatist who believes the major parties have ignored regional and rural Australia. After a period in the New South Wales Parliament when he held the biggest margin in the state, he switched as a federal Independent to New England, the northern NSW seat previously held by long-time Nationals leader Ian Sinclair.

Rob Oakeshott, a cosmopolitan character with a social conscience, likewise holds a traditional National Party seat held previously by another Nationals leader, Mark Vaile, for whom he once worked. He describes his style as ''community politics'', by which he means putting his electorate first.

These three Independent MPs today hold the key to who forms government - Julia Gillard's Labor or Tony Abbott's Coalition.

However, it is far too simplistic to assume these three former National Party members will automatically support the Coalition. They are very independent Independents who have long-standing axes to grind with their old party - antipathies that are reciprocated.

Tony Windsor made clear his disaffection with senior National Party figures when he called Queensland National Barnaby Joyce ''a fool'' during a heated exchange on TV on election night. Bob Katter sent shivers through the Coalition

on Saturday night when he accused Nationals leader Warren Truss of attacking him personally and described an unplugged intervention by Senator Joyce as a ''similar piece of incredible unfortunateness''.

Along with Rob Oakeshott, who holds the NSW coastal seat of Lyne, all three have proved extremely successful in their independence, sitting on comfortable margins that have proved impossible for the major parties to breach.

And all have been preparing for some time to flex their collective muscle in the case of a hung parliament, which now confronts the Federal Parliament.

A month ago they agreed to ''caucus'' before they entered any discussions with the major parties. They also agreed to consider seeking a meeting with Treasury secretary Ken Henry to get detailed advice about the economy and to compare the spending plans of the Labor Party and the Coalition.

The agreement bodes uncertain times for Mr Abbott and Ms Gillard as they try to reach workable arrangements.

The gang of three is not a naturally cohesive political group. Its members are united only in their opposition to the structured party system, and each of them commands large blocs of support from both traditional Labor and Coalition voters in their electorates.

Mr Katter's electorate of Kennedy covers almost a third of Queensland and despite - or perhaps because of - his outspoken manner, he is considered one of the savviest electorate operators in Australia.

He says he learned his craft by wandering from town to town, property to property, simply listening and understanding the well of anger that had built up in remote communities.

One of the toughest problems for Tony Abbott in his attempt to win support from these three renegades from the conservative fold is their strong support for the Gillard government's National Broadband Network.

Mr Katter, who was appalled by the Howard government's Telstra sell-off, believes privatised communications will inevitably harm rural residents because private operators would have no reason to maintain loss-making operations in remote areas.

Mr Windsor and Mr Oakeshott share this view, although their support for the broadband network is more nuanced, but they consider Mr Abbott's scheme inferior.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Fancy ending up in a situation where the town clown has a say in the formation the Government of the country, what a dog’s breakfast. Australia what were you thinking?
Posted by Lara, 23/08/2010 3:15:27 PM
Bob Katter for PM i say.... bout' time we had someone up front thats not afraid to call a spade a spade ...go hard Bob
Posted by mic, 24/08/2010 11:14:26 AM
Well Lara it could have been worse, it's bad enough the green's having power in the senate but the house of reps as well would have been a total disaster.
Posted by jumpy, 24/08/2010 2:36:24 PM
Thinking about the 2010 election campaign, it seems to me that nothing either major political party has said, or done, during this contest would have changed either sides prospects at the polls. Debates, television appearances, fund - raising, advertising, news coverage and campaign strategies-the usual grist for the punditry mills - counted for virtually nothing on election day. Seemingly, the only issue that really mattered to voters, was, that they were primarily having a referenda on the performance (and luck?), of the incumbent Prime Minister and her government's performance. Key points, like the mandate, short-term economic emergency stimulus, sudden policy changes (boats/tax/climate), foreign military failures or success etc, all combined to set the scene. So that in the case of the Liberal Party candidate, Ms Fiona Scott, having only successfully nominated for the Electorate of Lindsay, on the day of the proroguing of parliament, with no discernible public debate with her, she obtained a huge first preference vote. Why? because, in my opinion, the vote was a referenda about the ALP Gillard Government, and not Ms Scott and the Liberal Party Policy. Interesting times.
Posted by Ralf, 26/08/2010 12:10:26 AM
THE GREENS WANT TO REINTRODUCE DEATH DUTIES Part of the reason we have a hung parliament now is because well-meaning people voted Green thinking that Green = Pro Environment But how many Green voters know that the Greens want: 1. To REINTRODUCE DEATH DUTIES (they call them "Estate Taxes") 2. To INCREASE CAPITAL GAINS TAX 3. To INCREASE TAX ON SUPERANNUATION SAVINGS 4. To INCREASE PERSONAL INCOME TAXES BY INCREASING THE TOP MARGINAL RATE If in doubt check it out by looking up the Greens own web site: http://greens.org.au/policies/sus tainable-economy/economics If Rob Oakeshot thinks that those in his electorate and in other electorates who voted Green actually knew that a vote for the Greens was a vote for the above taxes, then he should give his support to Julia. If on the other hand, he thinks that those who voted Green just wanted to protect the environment and didn't know about the Greens' tax grab policies, then he should give his support to Tony Abbott. Ask around your electorate Rob. My bet is that Green voters in your electorate and in other electorates had NO IDEA about the Greens' Neanderthal tax agenda.
Posted by ourvirtualprimeminister, 26/08/2010 1:22:33 PM
Interesting times indeed. But people might have noticed that within the last few days, there has been no mention of those 'nasty boat-people' which shows that the 'stop the boats' slogan was just another way to descent down to the lowest common denominator. My analysis show this. The Rudd factor was a real one, you just don't dump a Prime Minister like they dump NSW Premiers. Both parties went for the lowest common denominator and as a result, they got half the votes each. The only real difference between the two was in the NBN broadband proposals and that was it. In overall term, people like Bitar, Arbib and Shorten have a lot to answer for in more ways than one and in terms of the Greens, they will now have to come up with actual policies instead of actual waffle but, In that department, that might be too much to ask for.
Posted by Henk Luf, 26/08/2010 2:29:07 PM
"Fancy ending up in a situation where the town clown has a say in the formation the Government of the country, what a dog’s breakfast. Australia what were you thinking?" we are thinking, with thinkers' like yourself, who cannot phrase a question, with no positive answers, no wonder australia is going backwards with 'clowns' like you.
Posted by mos, 26/08/2010 8:45:21 PM
Mos, does the term rhetorical mean anything to you? Probably not given your contribution.
Posted by Lara, 27/08/2010 11:49:25 AM
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Which side deserves the support of the independent and Green MPs who will decide the balance of power?

Coalition
(58.3%)

Labor
(41.7%)

Total Votes: 6396
Poll Date: 22 August, 2010

Most popular articles




Southern Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...